TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? – Intellectual Property

0
3


United States:

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The TTAB recently decided the appeals
from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals
summarized below. Keeping in mind that, by my estimate, 90 % of
Section 2(d) appeals result in affirmance of the refusal, how do
you think these came out? [Answer will be found in the first
comment.]

1048928a.jpg


In re Hungry Pet Nutrition LLC
, Application
Serial No. 88625423 (March 11, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by
Judge Cynthia C. Lynch). [Section 2(d) refusal
of SUPERFOOD FOR SUPERDOGS for “dog
food, namely, dry kibbles for dogs only; none of the above
including dog snacks, dog treats, pet snacks or pet treats”
[SUPERFOOD FOR DOGS disclaimed], in view of the registered
mark SUPERFOOD SNACKS FOR DOGS for
“pet food; edible pet treats; edible organic pet treats for
dogs; edible vegan pet treats for dogs” [SNACKS FOR DOGS
disclaimed]].

1048928b.jpg

In re Plant Therapy, LLC,
Serial No. 88722907 (March 12, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by
Judge Michael B. Adlin). [Section 2(d) Refusal
of MUSCLE AID for essential oils [MUSCLE
disclaimed] in view of the identical mark registered for “for
“blended liquid mineral dietary supplements and nutritional
dietary supplements” [MUSCLE disclaimed].

1048928c.jpg

 
In re Boulevard West, Inc.
, Serial No. 87692255
(March 16, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S.
Goodman). [Section 2(d) refusal of BOULEVARD INSURANCE
STRATEGIES & Design
 for “Financial and
investment services, namely, financial portfolio management
services, investment advisory services, financial planning
services, and investment management services for high-wealth
individuals and families,” in view of the registered
mark BOULEVARD for “accepting,
processing, and reconciling credit card, debit card, gift card and
other forms of payment transactions via a global computer network;
financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial
transactions and payment options.”]  

1048928d.jpg


The TTABlog

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States

Trademarks Comparative Guide

Obhan & Associates

Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries

GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva – Not A Skinny Label?

Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P

The decision in GlaxoSmithKline LLC. V Teva Pharms. (976 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2020) has caused panic in the generic industry because it has been interpreted…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here