From plate to plough: Sowing nutrition security

0
2

Fertilisers also augment productivity, keeping food prices lower than they would be otherwise. This is well understood in literature, but its impact on human nutrition is not well-quantified yet.Fertilisers also augment productivity, keeping food prices lower than they would be otherwise. This is well understood in literature, but its impact on human nutrition is not well-quantified yet.

By Howarth Bouis & Ashok gulati

On the occasion of World Food Day (October 16), prime minister Narendra Modi issued a commemorative coin of Rs 75 and dedicated 17 bio-fortified varieties of eight crops to the nation to celebrate the establishment of Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) 75 years ago in 1945.

Incidentally, in the main lobby of FAO headquarters in Rome, there is a small plaque on the wall that reads: “In this building, 16th of October 1945, representatives of 44 nations met and established the FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION, first of the new United Nations Agencies. Thus, for the first time, nations organized to raise levels of nutrition and to improve production and distribution of food and agricultural products.” The point of note is that even 75 years ago, agricultural policymakers, in setting priorities, mentioned improving human nutrition before improving agricultural production. After all, a primary objective of agriculture is to produce food that provides enough minerals and vitamins that sustain healthy human beings. This is often forgotten in our efforts to improve agricultural productivity and farm incomes.

What we know today is that almost two billion women and children in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) are at risk for vitamin A, iron, and zinc deficiencies, leading to more sickness, more deaths, and lower cognitive ability—all combining to reduce economic growth significantly. The highest numbers of women and children suffering from this “hidden hunger” reside in South Asia, especially India.

The primary underlying cause for mineral and vitamin deficiencies is low-quality diets. The poor desire but cannot afford to purchase sufficient quantities of vegetables, fruits, pulses, and animal products—which, gram for gram, contain relatively high amounts of bioavailable minerals and vitamins, but whose prices have been rising much faster than staples like wheat, rice, corn, etc, over the past several decades. No wonder, the poor satiate their hunger by consuming large amounts of food staples, which only go down with higher levels of incomes.

How to address low intake of minerals and vitamins through agriculture? There are two broad strategies. The first is improve the densities of minerals and vitamins in the high amounts of staples that the poor consume. The second is to increase the quantities eaten of nutritious non-staple foods. This second broad strategy fundamentally depends on raising incomes and lowering the real prices of non-staple foods.

Food staples are not dense on minerals and vitamins, but they do provide significant amounts of a broad range of essential minerals and vitamins—a base on which non-staple foods should add. The absolute intake of minerals and vitamins from food staples is the result of multiplying quantities consumed times the density. The first term in this multiplication, quantities consumed of food staples, is a high number.

The objective, then, within the sub-strategy of focusing on food staples, is to increase densities of nutritious components and to decrease the densities of undesirable compounds. One way this can be done is through conventional plant breeding. A term has been coined for this process, “biofortification.”

From that angle, PM Modi’s endorsement of eight bio-fortified crops is commendable. The credit for this also goes to the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), and many agri-scientists of India such as MS Swaminathan, for their long-term vision and perseverance to develop bio-fortified crops. These bio-fortified staples need to be closely linked to India’s food-based welfare programmes such as Public Distribution System, Mid-Day Meal, Anganwadi, etc., and should become an integral part of the National Nutrition Mission (POSHAN Abhiyan). This would also help fighting the adverse impact of Covid-19 on nutrition of vulnerable population.

But linking agriculture and nutrition only starts with biofortification. We must not stop there. For example, relatively new evidence demonstrates that nitrogenous fertilisers increase the densities of proteins, minerals and vitamins in staple foods. Adding zinc and/or iodine to fertilisers and foliar sprays also will increase the zinc and iodine density in grains. There are synergies in combining these fertiliser strategies with biofortified crops. The evidence for these pathways was developed under the “Harvest Zinc” programme by Ismail Cakmak of Sabanci University in Turkey and his colleagues in LMICs, including India.

Fertilisers also augment productivity, keeping food prices lower than they would be otherwise. This is well understood in literature, but its impact on human nutrition is not well-quantified yet.

Turning now to vegetables, fruits, pulses, animal products—those foods which are already dense in minerals and vitamins, the fundamental strategy should be to increase the supply of specific key foods that can contribute importantly to nutrient intakes where supply can be increased cost-effectively through public policy and investments.

There are two fundamental points to make. First, the primary objective is to lower the real prices of these specific foods. Second, these specific foods will vary greatly by country, depending on dietary patterns.

For example, the major push by the Indian government, called Operation Flood, improved the efficiency of milk production, a highly nutritious and important food in Indian diets. Supply went up sharply and the relative real price went down significantly. Milk consumption increased.

Investing in more efficient milk value chain in India was an incredibly “nutrition-smart” agricultural activity that benefitted millions throughout India. A similar push is needed today for fruits and vegetables, and pulses. The current reforms in farm laws offer an opportunity to develop similar value chains for these as was done in milk.

Agricultural policymakers typically focus on increasing productivity and farmers’ incomes. But investing in improved nutrition through agriculture has extremely high economic payoffs. Thus, prime minister Modi’s bringing attention on bio-fortified basic staples and linking it to public food programmes deserves all the compliments and admiration for an important and long-standing concept.

Bouis is a World Food Laureate for his work on Bio-fortification and Gulati is Infosys Chair Professor for Agriculture at ICRIER

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here